Short, easy, unstylish, direct, queer, exciting, overly simple, too self-aware, weird in a good way, worth it for the unique mix of magic and anarchism.
This historical treatise has a lot of notoriety but I found it unnecessarily dense, and ultimately flawed, in that its focus on states and state power ignores a related discussion of capitalist power, such that altho there is a useful perspective to glean here about how a drive for social legibility can transform a society, I wouldn't recommend the book overall.
Comments
Post a Comment