The thing reads like he finished it and the editor told him to punch it up so he went back and tacked dad jokes on to every line he could think of one - I couldn’t get through it.
This historical treatise has a lot of notoriety but I found it unnecessarily dense, and ultimately flawed, in that its focus on states and state power ignores a related discussion of capitalist power, such that altho there is a useful perspective to glean here about how a drive for social legibility can transform a society, I wouldn't recommend the book overall.
Comments
Post a Comment