it’s cheesy, it’s naive, it didn’t age all that well, but on the other hand the characters are great, the dialog is funny, and the early 90s vibe is on point.
This historical treatise has a lot of notoriety but I found it unnecessarily dense, and ultimately flawed, in that its focus on states and state power ignores a related discussion of capitalist power, such that altho there is a useful perspective to glean here about how a drive for social legibility can transform a society, I wouldn't recommend the book overall.
Comments
Post a Comment